How to read any of the answers
Two failure modes, opposite in direction, and both are common.
The clinician who reads everything through culture. Every difficulty explained by immigration and family structure, including the ones that aren’t. You end up as an example of a pattern rather than a person.
The clinician who reads none of it. Your family described as enmeshed, boundaries offered as the answer, and a steady low-level implication that a normal person would have distanced themselves by now.
What you want sits between: someone who can hold your context without either flattening it or making it the explanation for everything.
The thing that isn’t a question
Notice how it feels to talk to them for fifteen minutes. Whether you found yourself pre-emptively explaining. Whether you softened something. Whether you left having performed a reasonable version of your family.
That’s data, and it’s frequently better data than any answer they gave.
One thing worth saying in the first session
What you aren’t looking for. If you don’t want to be steered toward cutting your family off, say so early — it’s a legitimate position and a good clinician will work with it rather than treat it as something to be overcome. More on the first session.